Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=609012 --- Comment #6 from Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak@xxxxx> 2010-11-04 12:43:36 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > * description and spec file clean, no useless comments > > - URL contains a dead link. Fixed > - Project name and package name consistency GoodData-CL Vs. gooddata-cl > - Build failed for f13 [1] F13 is too old. and also f14 [2]. Fixed. > gooddata-cl.src: W: no-buildroot-tag > * if this package is intended to be build for EPEL, it should contain > buildroot tag. EPEL is even more ancient. > gooddata-cl.src: W: strange-permission gooddata-cli 0755L > * file listed in %{_bindir}, rpmlint shouldn't be complaining Well this is about the Source file. Fixed. > - missing BuildDeps reported by koji: > > DEBUG util.py:260: No Package Found for axis >= 1.4 > DEBUG util.py:260: No Package Found for javacc-maven-plugin > DEBUG util.py:260: No Package Found for xpp3-minimal >= 1.1.3.8-3.4 > DEBUG util.py:260: No Package Found for xstream >= 1.3.1 > DEBUG util.py:260: No Package Found for json-lib > DEBUG util.py:260: No Package Found for gdata-java > 1.39 This is on F13. That's too old. SPEC: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/SPECS/gooddata-cl.spec SRPM: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/SRPMS/gooddata-cl-1.1.4-2.fc14.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review