Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libtcd - Tide Constituent Database Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217277 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus@xxxxxxx 2006-11-27 03:58 EST ------- I know that perfectly. If your point is that a static library should be in libtcd-static, I agree, this is better. If it is another issue, please read the thread https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2006-November/msg00713.html All the points listed in Motivations are moot in case of the use I point out. And I will never ask FESCO about whether static libs should be shipped or not. I trust better my own judgment in that case, and I don't want to use FESCO time on reviews, they already have enough things to do. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review