Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libtcd - Tide Constituent Database Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217277 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203@xxxxxxxxxx 2006-11-27 02:04 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > As I said in another post I think that in this a case where > keeping the static library makes sense since it could be used to > handle trusted data in numerical experiments where compiling > statically enhance portability. You can keep it out, as long as > you respond favorably to users asking to have it back. Pertusus, please carefully read: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/StaticLinkage -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review