Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: new package suggestion: keepass https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198644 jpmahowald@xxxxxxxxx changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jpmahowald@xxxxxxxxx ------- Additional Comments From jpmahowald@xxxxxxxxx 2006-11-26 23:42 EST ------- Needs some work: - don't use vendor tag - use BuildRequires and not BuildPreReq - Drop Requires: qt4 as rpm should figure out library dependencies - don't define Prefix - you do not need to define a version macro, merely specify the version in Version: tag I'm doubtful about the conditional Fedora build if. This spec will be maintained in Fedora version control anyway, the regular package spec stuff is not needed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review