[Bug 537983] Review Request: python-visual - 3D Programming

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537983

Mohamed El Morabity <pikachu.2014@xxxxxxxxx> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Flag|                            |fedora-review+

--- Comment #33 from Mohamed El Morabity <pikachu.2014@xxxxxxxxx> 2010-10-24 09:26:31 EDT ---
Ok for the licensing. At last the review:

MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package.
->OK, no warning for all the RPMs

MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
->OK

MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption.
->OK

MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines.
->OK

MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the
Licensing Guidelines.
->OK

MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license.
->OK

MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s)
in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the
package must be included in %doc.
->OK

MUST: The spec file must be written in American English.
->OK

MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible.
->OK

MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
-> OK, md5sum = 866f51f0c49b60086dbe3581f508d30b

MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at
least one primary architecture.
->OK, tested on x86_64 with mock

MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an
architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in
ExcludeArch.
->N/A

MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any
that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging GuidelinesÂ;
inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional.
->OK

MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the
%find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden.
->N/A

MUST: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library
files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must
call ldconfig in %post and %postun.
->N/A

MUST: Packages must NOT bundle copies of system libraries.
->N/A

MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state
this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for
relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is
considered a blocker.
->N/A

MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create
a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create
that directory.
->OK

MUST: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's
%files listings. 
->OK

MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with
executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a
%defattr(...) line.
->OK

MUST: Each package must consistently use macros.
->OK

MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content.
->OK

MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage.
->OK

MUST: If a package includes something asÂ%doc, it must not affect the runtime
of the application. To summarize: If it is inÂ%doc, the program must run
properly if it is not present.
->OK

MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package.
->N/A

MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package.
->N/A

MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1),
then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel
package.
->N/A

MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base
package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires:Â%{name} =
%{version}-%{release}.
->N/A

MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these must be removed
in the spec if they are built.
->OK

MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include aÂ%{name}.desktop file,
and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the
%install section.
->N/A

MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other
packages.
->OK

MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8.
->OK

This package is _at last_ APPROVED!

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review



[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]