[Bug 637904] Review Request: rubygem-atk - Ruby binding of ATK-1.0.x

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=637904

Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED

--- Comment #6 from Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2010-10-06 08:59:52 EDT ---
Thank you!

Now only commenting for this:

(In reply to comment #5)
> Btw, just curious, but do you plan to package ruby-gtk bindings ?

Please check bug 639098 and the bugs blocking the bug.
I will explain what I am trying to do now.

Currently ruby-gnome2 is already in Fedora:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=3765
and ruby-gtk2 binary rpm is currently created from ruby-gnome2 srpm.

Now ruby-gnome2 upstream also released gems for ruby-gtk2 part
from 0.90.0, so for ruby-gtk2 part (i.e. rsvg2 gtk2 pango gdk_pixbuf2
atk) I am going to make rpms based on released gem files, and make
rpms generated from ruby-gnome2 srpm obsoleted by gem-based rpm.

The rest part (i.e. bonobo2, gconf2, ...) still have to be rebuilt
from ruby-gnome2 srpm.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]