Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=639272 Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED QAContact|extras-qa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |mtasaka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #2 from Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2010-10-04 18:10:51 EDT --- Some notes: * Unused macros - It seems that %ruby_sitelib macro is used nowhere. * Requires/BuildRequires - rubygem(rake) is for $ rake test and s.add_development_dependency in gemspec file, so this is not needed for "Requires" (for BuildRequires this is needed). - ">= 0.4" or ">= 0" parts on (Build)Requires: rubygem(foo) are not needed because packages on currently supported Fedora branches all satisfy these version dependencies. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Explicit_Requires * Directory ownership issue - The directory %geminstdir itself is not owned by any packages. * %files - Please check if %geminstdir/%gemname.gemspec is really needed ( I guess not. Note that gemspec file is also installed under %gemdir/specifications ) * Document files - I think for this package -doc file should be created and the following entries should be moved to -doc: ------------------------------------------------------------------ %{geminstdir}/test %{geminstdir}/Rakefile %{geminstdir}/doc %{gemdir}/doc/%{gemname}-%{version} ------------------------------------------------------------------ ( I usually think that especially test/ directory should not be in main package ) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review