Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: erlang-protobuffs - A set of Protocol Buffers tools and modules for Erlang applications https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=638974 Summary: Review Request: erlang-protobuffs - A set of Protocol Buffers tools and modules for Erlang applications Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ReportedBy: lemenkov@xxxxxxxxx QAContact: extras-qa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx CC: notting@xxxxxxxxxx, fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://peter.fedorapeople.org/erlang-protobuffs.spec SRPM URL: http://peter.fedorapeople.org/erlang-protobuffs-0-0.1.20100930git58ff962.fc12.src.rpm Description: A set of Protocol Buffers tools and modules for Erlang applications. This is one of the requirements for rebar. Koji scratch build for F-14: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2503786 rpmlint messages: Sulaco ~/rpmbuild/SPECS: rpmlint ../RPMS/ppc/erlang-protobuffs-0-0.1.20100930git58ff962.fc12.ppc.rpm erlang-protobuffs.ppc: E: explicit-lib-dependency erlang-stdlib erlang-protobuffs.ppc: E: no-binary erlang-protobuffs.ppc: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 1 warnings. Sulaco ~/rpmbuild/SPECS: First message is a false positive (note the "lib" sub-string in the name of "erlang-stdlib" runtime dependency). The rest should be ignored too since it's raised due to installation on arch-independent Erlang's VM data into arch-dependent library, but that's how Erlang/OTP is designed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review