Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=629145 --- Comment #9 from Jens Petersen <petersen@xxxxxxxxxx> 2010-09-13 02:43:43 EDT --- (In reply to comment #8) > ? %defattr line > No way to tell as there is no %file manifest You can check the filelists %{name}*.files in the build directory. They are automatically generated by macros in macros.ghc. > - static libraries should be in -static > There is a .a file contained but its not clear from the haskell package > guidelines regarding this Agreed this is unfortunate but currently ghc assumes and requires the presence of the static library so they can't be subpackaged yet. I hope this will change in the future. (Actually ghc's shared library support is still considered somewhat experimental but seems to work well - I don't know if any other distro which has actually adopted them yet though.) The Haskell Guidelines should state this clearly, though they were written but ghc-6.12 which introduced shared lib support on linux. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Haskell#Static_vs._Dynamic_Linking Yes, the packaging guidelines need a refresh too. Running cabal2spec-diff on the tarball should show you how the package differences from the standard Haskell templates. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review