Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=627638 --- Comment #2 from Steve Traylen <steve.traylen@xxxxxxx> 2010-08-27 10:54:36 EDT --- > Why source from git? There no stable releases ant tarballs? Then it should be > reflected in version-release. Additionally you shoud provide implicit branch > what you clone from git to get ability reproduce it at any time. There seems to be no tar ball or similar created. There are just tags in the repo, e.g. http://repo.or.cz/w/git2cl.git/tag/refs/tags/git2cl-2.0 in particular so this is version 2.0 clearly as opposed to say earlier versions: http://repo.or.cz/w/git2cl.git/tag/refs/tags/git2cl-1.2 As such I don't think a git point is needed in the release since this is clearly the released version of git2cl. However I guess the tag could be moved so I am happy to put say. Version: 2.0 Release: 0.1.git8373c9f%{?dist} which is from $ git clone http://repo.or.cz/w/git2cl.git $ git checkout git2cl-2.0 HEAD is now at 8373c9f... Generated. $ git archive git2cl-2.0 | gzip -c > git2cl-2.0.tar.gz I think that is probably better as it has both the release of the tag and the git hash. Steve. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review