Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=618480 --- Comment #9 from Chen Lei <supercyper1@xxxxxxxxx> 2010-08-27 10:05:03 EDT --- (In reply to comment #8) > > %{?_isa} is only useful for broken repo, using arch specfic requires for lib > > package should be prefered because of the existence of multilib. > You are not answered - do you known date when it planning to accept it draft by > FESCO? > Another question can it package correctly functional without %_isa macros, or > this strongly required? FPC already have a ticket about this, you may need to ask FPC member for the exact date. See https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/2 Currently, %{?_isa} is optional. A lot of qt/kde packages already started to use this macro. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review