Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=626122 --- Comment #5 from Chen Lei <supercyper1@xxxxxxxxx> 2010-08-26 11:48:06 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > That's good, if they've not done any formal upstream release yet, then its > definitely worth encouraging them to change the naming to avoid this obvious > namespace clash. I think we have two choice: 1.Rename fedora qmf rpm to libqmf, then use qmf for this package(actually all other distributions use qmf for this package) 2. Keep fedora qmf rpm, then persuade Nokia to name this package as libqmf. Currently, I can't other reasonable name for this package. FYI, upstream tend to call this package as qmf. See http://qt.gitorious.org/qt-labs/messagingframework/blobs/master/README -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review