[Bug 609011] Review Request: derby - Relational database implemented entirely in Java

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=609011

Maros Zatko <hacxman@xxxxxxxxx> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |hacxman@xxxxxxxxx

--- Comment #5 from Maros Zatko <hacxman@xxxxxxxxx> 2010-07-29 12:50:39 EDT ---
OK - rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the
review.
OK - The package must be named according to the  Package Naming Guidelines .
OK - The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption.
?? - The package must meet the  Packaging Guidelines  .
OK - The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the 
Licensing Guidelines .
OK - The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license.
OK - If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in
its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the
package must be included in %doc.[4]
OK - The spec file must be written in American English.
OK - The spec file for the package MUST be legible.
OK - The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. If no
upstream URL can be specified for this package, please see the  Source URL
Guidelines  for how to deal with this.
* Source db-derby-10.6.1.0-src.tar.gz is the same as upstream
* Source derby-10.6.1.0.pom is the same as upstream
* Source derby-project-10.6.1.0.pom is the same as upstream
* Source derbyLocale_cs-10.6.1.0.pom is the same as upstream
* Source derbyLocale_de_DE-10.6.1.0.pom is the same as upstream
* Source derbyLocale_es-10.6.1.0.pom is the same as upstream
* Source derbyLocale_fr-10.6.1.0.pom is the same as upstream
* Source derbyLocale_hu-10.6.1.0.pom is the same as upstream
* Source derbyLocale_it-10.6.1.0.pom is the same as upstream
* Source derbyLocale_ja_JP-10.6.1.0.pom is the same as upstream
* Source derbyLocale_ko_KR-10.6.1.0.pom is the same as upstream
* Source derbyLocale_pl-10.6.1.0.pom is the same as upstream
* Source derbyLocale_pt_BR-10.6.1.0.pom is the same as upstream
* Source derbyLocale_ru-10.6.1.0.pom is the same as upstream
* Source derbyLocale_zh_CN-10.6.1.0.pom is the same as upstream
* Source derbyLocale_zh_TW-10.6.1.0.pom is the same as upstream
* Source derbyclient-10.6.1.0.pom is the same as upstream
* Source derbynet-10.6.1.0.pom is the same as upstream
* Source derbytools-10.6.1.0.pom is the same as upstream
FAIL - The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at
least one primary architecture.

Does not build in koji.
See http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2356692

build.log from mock:
/var/tmp/rpm-tmp.rd7cdF: line 53: ant: command not found

Please add ant to dependencies.

This review was informal and is incomplete.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]