[Bug 226813] Merge Review: zsh

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226813

Kevin Fenzi <kevin@xxxxxxxxx> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Flag|fedora-review?              |fedora-review+

--- Comment #17 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin@xxxxxxxxx> 2010-07-18 20:07:06 EDT ---
Wow... here we are 3 years later. :) 

I went ahead and re-ran my review checklist against the current version: 

OK - Package meets naming and packaging guidelines
OK - Spec file matches base package name. 
OK - Spec has consistant macro usage. 
OK - Meets Packaging Guidelines. 
OK - License
OK - License field in spec matches
OK - License file included in package
OK - Spec in American English
OK - Spec is legible.
OK - Sources match upstream md5sum:
74c5b275544400082a1cde806c98682a  zsh-4.3.10.tar.bz2
74c5b275544400082a1cde806c98682a  zsh-4.3.10.tar.bz2.orig
OK - BuildRequires correct
OK - Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good. 
OK - Package has a correct %clean section. 
OK - Package has correct buildroot
OK - Package is code or permissible content. 
OK - Doc subpackage needed/used. 
OK - Packages %doc files don't affect runtime. 
OK - Package has rm -rf RPM_BUILD_ROOT at top of %install

OK - Package compiles and builds on at least one arch. 
OK - Package has no duplicate files in %files. 
OK - Package doesn't own any directories other packages own. 
OK - Package owns all the directories it creates. 
OK - Package obey's FHS standard (except for 2 exceptions)
See below - No rpmlint output. 
OK - final provides and requires are sane.

SHOULD Items:

OK - Should build in mock. 
OK - Should build on all supported archs
OK - Should function as described. 
OK - Should have sane scriptlets. 
OK - Should have dist tag
OK - Should package latest version
OK - Should not use file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, or
/usr/sbin
OK - check for outstanding bugs on package (merge reviews/rename/re-reviews).  

Issues: 

1. Non blocker, but would '--enable-cap' and '--enable-multibyte' be worth
enabling?

2. the tests do indeed hang in local mock here. How does this work in koji?

3. Non blocker, I tried to nuke the %makeinstall with no luck. 
Perhaps just add a note that it's required? 

4. rpmlint says: 

Can't this just be removed now: 

zsh.src:26: E: prereq-use fileutils grep /sbin/install-info
zsh.src: E: specfile-error warning: line 26: prereq is deprecated: Prereq:
fileutils grep /sbin/install-info

Misc ignorable issues, fix if you like: 

zsh.src:136: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 1, tab: line 136)
zsh.x86_64: E: non-executable-script
/usr/share/zsh/4.3.10/functions/sticky-note 0644L /bin/zsh
zsh.x86_64: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/zsh/4.3.10/functions/mere
zsh.x86_64: E: non-executable-script
/usr/share/zsh/4.3.10/functions/calendar_add 0644L /bin/zsh
zsh.x86_64: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/zsh-4.3.10/LICENCE
zsh.x86_64: W: dangerous-command-in-%postun cp
zsh.x86_64: E: use-tmp-in-%postun

I don't see any blockers here, just suggestions, so this package is APPROVED. 

Please do consider the above suggestions for the package moving forward. ;) 

You can close this at your leasure...

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]