Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=611873 --- Comment #4 from Adam Huffman <bloch@xxxxxxxxxxxx> 2010-07-16 08:13:21 EDT --- New version at: http://verdurin.fedorapeople.org/reviews/R-Rsolid/R-Rsolid.spec http://verdurin.fedorapeople.org/reviews/R-Rsolid/R-Rsolid-0.9.2-3.fc13.src.rpm Upstream added a licensing clarification to the DESCRIPTION file, without changing the release number. The rest of your comments should have been addresses - some of the R problems were because I relied on the r2spec package, which is clearly a little out of date. I've also noted that it doesn't build on EPEL5, though I don't think that should hold out acceptance into Fedora. I'll pursue that separately with the authors. There is a new warning in rpmlint: R-Rsolid-devel.x86_64: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib There are only non binary files in /usr/lib so they should be in /usr/share. on which I'd welcome guidance. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review