[Bug 608421] Review Request: perl-Test-Without-Module - Test fallback behaviour in absence of modules

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=608421

--- Comment #1 from Iain Arnell <iarnell@xxxxxxxxx> 2010-07-15 00:01:56 EDT ---
+ source files match upstream.  
    4480ece707cb6bbedaae8fbe41320927  Test-Without-Module-0.17.tar.gz

+ package meets naming and versioning guidelines.
+ specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently.
- summary has a spelling error (Fedora requires American spelling)
    behaviour -> behavior

+ description is OK.
+ dist tag is present.
+ build root is OK.
+ license field matches the actual license.
    GPL+ or Artistic

+ license is open source-compatible.
+ license text not included upstream.
+ latest version is being packaged.
+ BuildRequires are proper.
+ compiler flags are appropriate.
+ %clean is present.
+ package builds in mock
    http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2321044

+ package installs properly.
- rpmlint has complaints:
    perl-Test-Without-Module.noarch: I: checking
    perl-Test-Without-Module.noarch: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) behaviour
-> behavior, behave, behalves
    perl-Test-Without-Module.noarch: I: checking-url
http://search.cpan.org/dist/Test-Without-Module/ (timeout 10 seconds)
    perl-Test-Without-Module.noarch: E: script-without-shebang
/usr/share/perl5/Test/Without/Module.pm
    perl-Test-Without-Module.noarch: W: spurious-executable-perm
/usr/share/doc/perl-Test-Without-Module-0.17/README
    perl-Test-Without-Module.noarch: E: wrong-script-end-of-line-encoding
/usr/share/doc/perl-Test-Without-Module-0.17/README
    perl-Test-Without-Module.noarch: W: spurious-executable-perm
/usr/share/doc/perl-Test-Without-Module-0.17/MANIFEST.skip
    perl-Test-Without-Module.noarch: W: spurious-executable-perm
/usr/share/doc/perl-Test-Without-Module-0.17/Changes
    perl-Test-Without-Module.noarch: E: wrong-script-end-of-line-encoding
/usr/share/doc/perl-Test-Without-Module-0.17/Changes
    perl-Test-Without-Module.src: I: checking
    perl-Test-Without-Module.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) behaviour ->
behavior, behave, behalves
    perl-Test-Without-Module.src: I: checking-url
http://search.cpan.org/dist/Test-Without-Module/ (timeout 10 seconds)
    perl-Test-Without-Module.src: I: checking-url
http://www.cpan.org/modules/by-module/Test/Test-Without-Module-0.17.tar.gz
(timeout 10 seconds)
    2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 3 errors, 5 warnings.

+ final provides and requires are sane:
    perl(Test::Without::Module) = 0.17
    perl-Test-Without-Module = 0.17-1.fc14
=
    perl(Carp)  
    perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.12.1)  
    perl(strict)  
    perl(vars)  

+ %check is present and all tests pass.
    + make test
    PERL_DL_NONLAZY=1 /usr/bin/perl "-MExtUtils::Command::MM" "-e"
"test_harness(0, 'blib/lib', 'blib/arch')" t/*.t
    t/01-api.t ........................ ok
    t/02-block-use-module.t ........... ok
    t/03-block-require-module.t ....... ok
    t/04-import-export.t .............. ok
    t/99-manifest.t ................... ok
    t/99-pod.t ........................ ok
    t/99-todo.t ....................... ok
    t/99-unix-text.t .................. ok
    # Checking for $VERSION = '0.17';
    t/99-versions.t ................... ok
    t/embedded-Test-Without-Module.t .. ok
    All tests successful.
    Files=10, Tests=27,  0 wallclock secs ( 0.04 usr  0.02 sys +  0.30 cusr 
0.03 csys =  0.39 CPU)
    Result: PASS

+ no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths.
+ owns the directories it creates.
+ doesn't own any directories it shouldn't.
+ no duplicates in %files.
- file permissions are appropriate.
    every file has executable bit set

+ no generically named files
+ code, not content.
+ documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary.
+ %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package.


rpmlint has a bunch of complaints that all need to be addressed. Basically,
remove executable permissions, dos2unix the docs, and "fix" the spelling of
"behaviour".

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]