Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=608421 --- Comment #1 from Iain Arnell <iarnell@xxxxxxxxx> 2010-07-15 00:01:56 EDT --- + source files match upstream. 4480ece707cb6bbedaae8fbe41320927 Test-Without-Module-0.17.tar.gz + package meets naming and versioning guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. - summary has a spelling error (Fedora requires American spelling) behaviour -> behavior + description is OK. + dist tag is present. + build root is OK. + license field matches the actual license. GPL+ or Artistic + license is open source-compatible. + license text not included upstream. + latest version is being packaged. + BuildRequires are proper. + compiler flags are appropriate. + %clean is present. + package builds in mock http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2321044 + package installs properly. - rpmlint has complaints: perl-Test-Without-Module.noarch: I: checking perl-Test-Without-Module.noarch: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) behaviour -> behavior, behave, behalves perl-Test-Without-Module.noarch: I: checking-url http://search.cpan.org/dist/Test-Without-Module/ (timeout 10 seconds) perl-Test-Without-Module.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/perl5/Test/Without/Module.pm perl-Test-Without-Module.noarch: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/perl-Test-Without-Module-0.17/README perl-Test-Without-Module.noarch: E: wrong-script-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/perl-Test-Without-Module-0.17/README perl-Test-Without-Module.noarch: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/perl-Test-Without-Module-0.17/MANIFEST.skip perl-Test-Without-Module.noarch: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/perl-Test-Without-Module-0.17/Changes perl-Test-Without-Module.noarch: E: wrong-script-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/perl-Test-Without-Module-0.17/Changes perl-Test-Without-Module.src: I: checking perl-Test-Without-Module.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) behaviour -> behavior, behave, behalves perl-Test-Without-Module.src: I: checking-url http://search.cpan.org/dist/Test-Without-Module/ (timeout 10 seconds) perl-Test-Without-Module.src: I: checking-url http://www.cpan.org/modules/by-module/Test/Test-Without-Module-0.17.tar.gz (timeout 10 seconds) 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 3 errors, 5 warnings. + final provides and requires are sane: perl(Test::Without::Module) = 0.17 perl-Test-Without-Module = 0.17-1.fc14 = perl(Carp) perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.12.1) perl(strict) perl(vars) + %check is present and all tests pass. + make test PERL_DL_NONLAZY=1 /usr/bin/perl "-MExtUtils::Command::MM" "-e" "test_harness(0, 'blib/lib', 'blib/arch')" t/*.t t/01-api.t ........................ ok t/02-block-use-module.t ........... ok t/03-block-require-module.t ....... ok t/04-import-export.t .............. ok t/99-manifest.t ................... ok t/99-pod.t ........................ ok t/99-todo.t ....................... ok t/99-unix-text.t .................. ok # Checking for $VERSION = '0.17'; t/99-versions.t ................... ok t/embedded-Test-Without-Module.t .. ok All tests successful. Files=10, Tests=27, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.04 usr 0.02 sys + 0.30 cusr 0.03 csys = 0.39 CPU) Result: PASS + no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. + owns the directories it creates. + doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. + no duplicates in %files. - file permissions are appropriate. every file has executable bit set + no generically named files + code, not content. + documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary. + %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. rpmlint has a bunch of complaints that all need to be addressed. Basically, remove executable permissions, dos2unix the docs, and "fix" the spelling of "behaviour". -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review