Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=611648 --- Comment #3 from Thomas Spura <tomspur@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2010-07-06 12:02:28 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > (In reply to comment #1) > > Review: > > - name: How about "libmtdev" like e.g. libacpi or libmpd? > It seems like this package don't need lib in package name. > > From naming guideline: > When naming a package, the name should match the upstream tarball or project > name from which this software came. ok, scratch that from the list. I just found it reasonable to name it like that, so this is just a matter of upstream naming... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review