Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: evolution-brutus Alias: evolution-brutus https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203520 ------- Additional Comments From colding@xxxxxxxxx 2006-11-07 04:06 EST ------- OK, all of the non-weak-symbols should be history by now. The devel package "Requires:" are fixed as well. New files here: SRPM: http://www.omesc.com/content/downloads/dist/Fedora%20Core%20Development/SRPMS/evolution-brutus-1.1.13-1.src.rpm SPEC: http://www.omesc.com/content/downloads/dist/Fedora%20Core%20Development/SPECS/evolution-brutus.spec BTW, you have an uncanny nack for knowing the complete chain of package requriements. Just like above when you points out that if I "Requires:" evolution-data-server-devel then I don't need ORBit2-devel as it is in "Requires:" for libbonobo-devel way down the Requires chain. How do you do that? A special spec hierachy browser or just a very good memory?? Thanks, jules -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review