Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=593800 --- Comment #15 from Felix Schwarz <felix.schwarz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2010-06-26 05:57:14 EDT --- Ratnadeep Debnath: Are you still interested in packaging python-keyring? I'm feeling a bit bad here just to hijack this review. Ratnadeep, please tell me if you're still interested - I'll step back then. If you don't have time right now, I'd like to take over. However as I needed this package for my private workflow, I modified the spec file quite a bit so that it complies to Fedora's guidelines, see http://www.felix-schwarz.name/files/misc/2010/python-keyring-0.2-1.fc13.2.src.rpm I think it is better than the previously linked versions. There is one pylint error which I can't fix: python-keyring.x86_64: E: no-binary As far as I know, it is not possible to have a noarch main package with arch-specific subpackages. Therefore the main package is not 'noarch' even though it does not contain binary files. Can we ignore this? I don't understand pylint's invalid url warning. I suspect it tries to do a HEAD request which the web site does not support. The url is perfectly fine though. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review