Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=600243 --- Comment #37 from Kalev Lember <kalev@xxxxxxxxxxxx> 2010-06-16 07:42:04 EDT --- Some people are actually using rawhide distribution. You don't need to deliberately create broken deps if it's easy to avoid that. First create a compatible package, then fix up everything that depends on the compatibility interface, and only after everything is fixed remove the compatibility interface. The libjpeg-turbo feature page states that no rebuilds are needed to switch to libjpeg-turbo as it is a drop-in replacement. You are now suggesting to make it non-drop-in, why would that be good? Also, the feature page says there is a contingency plan to revert back to libjpeg if there are serious problems. Chan, do you understand that if you quickly rebuild all packages to depend on libjpeg-turbo directly, then it will take another rebuild to revert back to libjpeg if it turns out libjpeg-turbo isn't working out? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review