[Bug 564518] Review Request: monodevelop-python - Python bindings for monodevelop

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=564518

Nathaniel McCallum <nathaniel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |ian@xxxxxxxxxxxxx,
                   |                            |nathaniel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

--- Comment #1 from Nathaniel McCallum <nathaniel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2010-06-15 11:52:15 EDT ---
[  OK  ] specfiles match:
[  OK  ] source files match upstream:
[  OK  ] package meets naming and versioning guidelines.
[  OK  ] spec is properly named, cleanly written, and uses macros consistently.
[  OK  ] dist tag is present.
[ FAIL ] build root is correct.
Use: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)
[ FAIL ] license field matches the actual license.
License appears to actually be MIT, not GPLv2+
[  OK  ] license is open source-compatible.
[ FAIL ] license text included in package.
Please include a LICENSE file in %doc
[ FAIL ] latest version is being packaged.
2.3.1 is available, does it build against Fedora's monodevelop?
[ FAIL ] BuildRequires are proper.
One dep per line is preferred.
[  OK  ] compiler flags are appropriate.
[  OK  ] %clean is present. 
[  ??  ] package builds in mock.
[  OK  ] package installs properly.
[  OK  ] debuginfo package looks complete.
[ FAIL ] rpmlint is silent.
monodevelop-python.src:50: E: files-attr-not-set
monodevelop-python.src:10: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 4,
tab: line 10)
monodevelop-python.x86_64: E: no-binary
monodevelop-python.x86_64: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib
monodevelop-python.x86_64: W: no-documentation
monodevelop-python-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation

Put %defattr(-,root,root,-) under %files devel
Include LICENSE in both packages
Fix whitespace

"E: no-binary" can probably be ignored.
[  OK  ] final provides and requires are sane
[  OK  ] %check is present and all tests pass:
[  OK  ] no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths.
[ FAIL ] owns the directories it creates.
You should probably do:
%dir %{_libdir}/monodevelop/AddIns/PyBinding
[  OK  ] doesn't own any directories it shouldn't.
[  OK  ] no duplicates in %files.
[  OK  ] file permissions are appropriate.
[  OK  ] scriptlets match those on ScriptletSnippets page.
[  OK  ] code, not content.
[  OK  ] documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary.
[  OK  ] %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package.
[  OK  ] no headers.
[  OK  ] no pkgconfig files.
[  OK  ] no libtool .la droppings.
[  OK  ] desktop files valid and installed properly.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]