Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=578480 --- Comment #24 from Michal Schmidt <mschmidt@xxxxxxxxxx> 2010-06-08 04:32:30 EDT --- (In reply to comment #22) > (In reply to comment #20) > > Both approaches are acceptable in general. > > I think so, I don't see any obvious packaging error in my approach. Agree? Agreed. > > Do you intend to support EL-4 too? If not, then it's pretty much equivalent to: > > %if 0%{?el5} > > Except that didn't work for me on RHEL-5. Hm, it works for me. Did you use a plain rpmbuild or mock? Both the "rhel" and "el5" macros are defined in the package "buildsys-macros" which is installed in the buildroot by mock (and thus in Koji too). > > Fair enough. But I wonder if this part of the Guidelines applies then: > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Architecture_Build_Failures > > Yes, except I have hard time to find the good failed build. It doesn't build > for me on F-12 (https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2236823), > and there are too many missing packages on RHEL-5/PPC. I don't think you need to look for any builds. In my understanding of the guideline it is sufficient to file a bug describing the reason for using ExcludeArch in your package and making it block a special tracking BZ. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review