Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537983 --- Comment #24 from Thomas Spura <tomspur@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2010-05-26 10:41:32 EDT --- (In reply to comment #23) > I'm still following this challenging review ^^. Good to read :) > Maybe you should not use the %exclude tag in %files, files tagges with it are > included into the calculated size whereas they are not installed. > > About the arch-ed doc package, I'm quite disappointed. If the examples, as > supposed by their name, are not required to run visual, they should be > considered to be documentation also, and set as %doc too. The reason, why I used %exclude was that, this is the easiest way to include the examples into the doc package, without to differ from upstream. Now I simply delete the examples and docs completely and include them as %doc in the doc package. This way it's slightly different from upstream, but the doc package is noarch again and %exclude is gone now: Spec URL: http://tomspur.fedorapeople.org/review/python-visual.spec SRPM URL: http://tomspur.fedorapeople.org/review/python-visual-5.32-5.fc13.src.rpm Hope that is better this way... :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review