Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=589162 --- Comment #2 from Jon Ciesla <limb@xxxxxxxxxxxx> 2010-05-06 10:43:43 EDT --- SRPM: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/stress/stress-1.0.4-2.fc12.src.rpm SPEC: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/stress/stress.spec I've addressed the permissions and doc issues, but I'm not sure I agree on the licensing issue. The license file is GPL3, the code says GPLv2+. I see no reason I can't then use GPLv3+. I agree that upstream should probably change their website. If you like, you can block FE-LEGAL and we can get a formal decision on this, because I very well may be wrong. I probably should have commented in the spec my reasoning on the license tag, and I can certainly do that if you like. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review