Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=589162 Terje Røsten <terjeros@xxxxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |terjeros@xxxxxxxxxxxx --- Comment #1 from Terje Røsten <terjeros@xxxxxxxxxxxx> 2010-05-06 04:57:21 EDT --- Some initial comments: - many files in the tarball has execute bit set, giving: stress.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/stress-1.0.4/README stress.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/stress-1.0.4/TODO stress.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/stress-1.0.4/doc/stress.texi stress.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/stress-1.0.4/AUTHORS stress.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/stress-1.0.4/INSTALL stress.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/stress-1.0.4/doc/Makefile.am stress.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/stress-1.0.4/doc/mdate-sh stress.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/stress-1.0.4/NEWS stress-debuginfo.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/src/debug/stress-1.0.4/src/stress.c Please fix that by chmod in %prep. - You include the whole doc/ dir in %doc, however the only useful file (already not included) is stress.html. - License: headers in stress.c has GPLv2+, while COPYING has GPLv3. Adding to the mess the web page states GPLv2. Current sitaution means license tag is GPLv2+, however you should contact upstream about this issue. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review