Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=585719 --- Comment #8 from Alain PORTAL <alain.portal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2010-04-29 17:25:36 EDT --- (In reply to comment #7) > Still some work needed here: It would be nice if you report problems once, and not only when I succeed to fix the one you reported before... > rpmlint: > > - E: empty-debuginfo-package. Unable to fix :-( > A related note: the build process is silent and it's not possible > to verify that correct build opts are being used during build. > Please fix both. I found a way to make the build process more verbose, but I don't think that help us... > - W: no-cleaning-of-buildroot %install > Not needed in later Fedoras? I don't know if this is needed in later Fedora, but I sure if there is a cleanup before, install is not possible: + /bin/rm -rf /home/alain/Fedora/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/wxformbuilder-3.1.68-4.fc12.x86_64 + install/linux/wxfb_export.sh /home/alain/Fedora/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/wxformbuilder-3.1.68-4.fc12.x86_64/usr mkdir: cannot create directory `/home/alain/Fedora/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/wxformbuilder-3.1.68-4.fc12.x86_64/usr': No such file or directory > - W: invalid-url URL: http://wxformbuilder.org/ BadStatusLine('',) > Strange, can't reproduce I can :-( Many problems to broese this site :-( > - E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath > /usr/lib64/wxformbuilder/libwxadditions-mini.so ['$ORIGIN'] > - E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/bin/wxformbuilder > ['$ORIGIN/../lib/wxformbuilder'] > Must be fixed I don't how. > - W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/ld.so.conf.d/wxformbuilder.conf > Add %config tag in %files Fixed > - W: invalid-url Source0: wxformbuilder-3.1.68.tar.bz2 > ignore. > > > A first look on license indicate GPLv2+, not GPLv2. More on that later. GGPL sayed: Version 2, June 1991, not "or later".. I would be please... > You can use xz (tar cJvf ...) to compress the tarball, saves 10%. ???? x is for extract... z is for bzip, j (as I used) is for bzip2... > And, in fact, the package don't build in koji, seems DSO related, logs here: > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2140121 Package build successfully in koji! F12 : http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2147057 F11 : http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2147075 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review