Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=581334 --- Comment #6 from Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2010-04-21 13:59:22 EDT --- Well, (In reply to comment #5) > * License > The file doesn't appear to be used for anything. I've reported the issue > upstream, and for now I have added an rm command in the %prep section. - As I said in the comment 4, ./doc_DE/dina4.sty must be removed from the source tarball itself ( i.e. you have to once unpack the source tarball, remove this file and repackage the tarball for Fedora. It is better that repackaged tarball should be renamed like "asl-current-XXXX-clean.tar.bz2 ) Once again please refer to https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL#When_Upstream_uses_Prohibited_Code ? By the way, while srpm release number contains "bld77", the source tarball says "bld75" is used. > * BuildRoot > I'd like to keep this for now, as I may also submit this for EPEL5. - Okay. > ! using iconv > I can't do it in %prep, as the file is generated. I'd rather do it in %build, > but unfortunately the upstream build system generates the doc files in "make > install", so without doing significant changes to the makefiles, it needs to > stay in %install. If you think this is a serious problem, I'll talk with > upstream. - Okay. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review