[Bug 579288] Review Request: pyclutter-gst - Python modules that allow you to use the Clutter-GST toolkit

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=579288

--- Comment #1 from Ankur Sinha <sanjay.ankur@xxxxxxxxx> 2010-04-14 06:57:44 EDT ---
review:

+ Package meets naming and packaging guidelines
+ Spec file matches base package name.
? Spec has consistant macro usage.
+ Meets Packaging Guidelines.
+ License
+ License field in spec matches
+ License file included in package
+ Spec in American English
+ Spec is legible.
+ Sources match upstream md5sum:
[Package@localhost SPECS]$ md5sum pyclutter-gst-1.0.0.tar.bz2 
b1cc99a70042bb91ad75937405ed64d9  pyclutter-gst-1.0.0.tar.bz2
[Package@localhost SPECS]$ md5sum ../SOURCES/pyclutter-gst-1.0.0.tar.bz2 
b1cc99a70042bb91ad75937405ed64d9  ../SOURCES/pyclutter-gst-1.0.0.tar.bz2

- Package needs ExcludeArch
+ BuildRequires correct
- Spec handles locales/find_lang
- Package is relocatable and has a reason to be.
+ Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good.
+ Package has a correct %clean section.
+ Package has correct buildroot
%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)
+ Package is code or permissible content.
- Doc subpackage needed/used.
+ Packages %doc files don't affect runtime.

+ Headers/static libs in -devel subpackage.
- Spec has needed ldconfig in post and postun
+ .pc files in -devel subpackage/requires pkgconfig
- .so files in -devel subpackage.
+ -devel package Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release}
+ .la files are removed.

- Package is a GUI app and has a .desktop file

+ Package compiles and builds on at least one arch.
+ Package has no duplicate files in %files.
+ Package doesn't own any directories other packages own.
+ Package owns all the directories it creates.
+ No rpmlint output.
- final provides and requires are sane:
(include output of for i in *rpm; do echo $i; rpm -qp --provides $i; echo =;
rpm -qp --requires $i; echo; done
manually indented after checking each line.  I also remove the rpmlib junk and
anything provided by glibc.)

SHOULD Items:

+ Should build in mock.
+ Should build on all supported archs
- Should function as described.
- Should have sane scriptlets.
+ Should have subpackages require base package with fully versioned depend.
+ Should have dist tag
+ Should package latest version
- check for outstanding bugs on package. (For core merge reviews)

Issues:

1.change %{buildroot} to $RPM_BUILD_ROOT on line 52

The rest looks okay.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]