Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=579291 --- Comment #1 from Ankur Sinha <sanjay.ankur@xxxxxxxxx> 2010-04-14 06:25:46 EDT --- review: + Package meets naming and packaging guidelines + Spec file matches base package name. ? Spec has consistant macro usage. + Meets Packaging Guidelines. + License + License field in spec matches + License file included in package + Spec in American English + Spec is legible. + Sources match upstream md5sum: [Package@localhost SPECS]$ md5sum pyclutter-gtk-0.10.0.tar.bz2 01ab4dc60e7d00737e372f38fdefa9f2 pyclutter-gtk-0.10.0.tar.bz2 [Package@localhost SPECS]$ md5sum ../SOURCES/pyclutter-gtk-0.10.0.tar.bz2 01ab4dc60e7d00737e372f38fdefa9f2 ../SOURCES/pyclutter-gtk-0.10.0.tar.bz2 - Package needs ExcludeArch - BuildRequires correct - Spec handles locales/find_lang - Package is relocatable and has a reason to be. + Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good. + Package has a correct %clean section. + Package has correct buildroot %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) + Package is code or permissible content. - Doc subpackage needed/used. + Packages %doc files don't affect runtime. + Headers/static libs in -devel subpackage. - Spec has needed ldconfig in post and postun ? .pc files in -devel subpackage/requires pkgconfig - .so files in -devel subpackage. + -devel package Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} + .la files are removed. - Package is a GUI app and has a .desktop file + Package compiles and builds on at least one arch. + Package has no duplicate files in %files. + Package doesn't own any directories other packages own. + Package owns all the directories it creates. ? No rpmlint output. [Package@localhost SPECS]$ rpmlint pyclutter-gtk.spec ../SRPMS/pyclutter-gtk-0.10.0-1.fc12.src.rpm 1 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [Package@localhost SRPMS]$ rpmlint pyclutter-gtk-0.10.0-1.fc12.src.rpm ../RPMS/x86_64/pyclutter-gtk-* pyclutter-gtk-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation - final provides and requires are sane: (include output of for i in *rpm; do echo $i; rpm -qp --provides $i; echo =; rpm -qp --requires $i; echo; done manually indented after checking each line. I also remove the rpmlib junk and anything provided by glibc.) SHOULD Items: + Should build in mock. + Should build on all supported archs ? Should function as described. - Should have sane scriptlets. + Should have subpackages require base package with fully versioned depend. + Should have dist tag + Should package latest version - check for outstanding bugs on package. (For core merge reviews) Issues: 1.change %{buildroot} to $RPM_BUILD_ROOT on line 51 2.If the package is intended for EPEL 5 also,I think you need to Requires: pkgconfig https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Pkgconfig_Files 3. not checked functioning. failed to build rpm for f12 4. rpmlint gives error since devel has no docs here. Isn't something major here. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review