Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=578290 --- Comment #9 from Klaus Grue <grue@xxxxxxx> 2010-04-10 17:40:05 EDT --- I will return as soon as possible. Just a few short notes. --- > > > mj.src: W: no-cleaning-of-buildroot %install > > > mj.src: W: no-buildroot-tag > > Could you take a look at that? > As I understand it, none of these have been needed since F-10 I agree. One should probably ignore rpmlint here. --- > I believe the best thing is to follow the general rule from the naming > guidelines and use the same name as the upstreams package. I agree. It is fortunate that 'mj' is not taken (as far as I have been able to see). --- > I can't imagine how it could make a difference if the author > "asserts" a right he can't surrender anyway. Julian Bradfield lives in Edinburgh (UK). So I think this applies: > It is important to note that authors or creators must choose > to assert their Moral Rights (they are not automatic as > copyright is), but at the same time, Moral Rights can never > be assigned - they remain with the author even if he or she > assigned the copyright to a publisher or some other organisation. So I think Julian Bradfield knows exactly what he does. I agree there would be no point in asserting moral rights in Scandinavia. --- > > Why are man pages not user writable? > It's an upstreams decision. OK. As long as man pages are uninstallable, it must be OK that they are not writable. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review