Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xtide - Calculate tide all over the world https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211626 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus@xxxxxxx 2006-10-21 11:34 EST ------- (In reply to comment #9) > > /sbin/ldconfig $(pwd)/libtcd || : > > is very dubious. In my opinion it shouldn't be there. > I thought that, however, without this I get: > > + LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/tasaka1/rpmbuild/BUILD/xtide-2.9dev/libtcd > + ./tcd-utils/build_tide_db harmonics-2004-06-14.tcd harmonics-2004-06-14.txt > ./tcd-utils/build_tide_db: error while loading shared libraries: libtcd.so.2: > cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory Strange. It works for me when I go to the tcd-utils directory and run it by hand. It gives me the error without LD_LIBRARY_PATH= > > I don't see why the somajor/minor/ver should be different from 0.0.0. > Umm, upstream has released libtcd version 1, which is API imcompatible > with version 2. Through version 2 libctd seems API compatible. > So I want to have SOMAJOR number 2 (and others similar). > > How do you think of soname versioning? If I'm not wrong upstream has never release any dynamic library, they may (in fact they should) begin with a soname of 0. The soname tracks ABI incompatible changes, not API changes. > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > In short: > > Well, before fixing this, will you tell me how do you think of > A. libtcd and tcd-utils release numbering (0<->1) libtcd 0., tcd-utils directly the release number > B. libtcd.so share object loading problem It works when doing things by hand, I'll try a rpmbuild. > C. soname versioning Begin with 0 for soname and 0.0.0 for library. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review