[Bug 211626] Review Request: xtide - Calculate tide all over the world

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: xtide - Calculate tide all over the world


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211626





------- Additional Comments From pertusus@xxxxxxx  2006-10-21 11:34 EST -------
(In reply to comment #9)


> > /sbin/ldconfig $(pwd)/libtcd || :
> > is very dubious. In my opinion it shouldn't be there.
> I thought that, however, without this I get:
> 
> + LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/tasaka1/rpmbuild/BUILD/xtide-2.9dev/libtcd
> + ./tcd-utils/build_tide_db harmonics-2004-06-14.tcd harmonics-2004-06-14.txt
> ./tcd-utils/build_tide_db: error while loading shared libraries: libtcd.so.2:
> cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory

Strange. It works for me when I go to the tcd-utils directory
and run it by hand. It gives me the error without LD_LIBRARY_PATH=


> > I don't see why the somajor/minor/ver should be different from 0.0.0.
> Umm, upstream has released libtcd version 1, which is API imcompatible
> with version 2. Through version 2 libctd seems API compatible.
> So I want to have SOMAJOR number 2 (and others similar).
>
> How do you think of soname versioning?

If I'm not wrong upstream has never release any dynamic library, they
may (in fact they should) begin with a soname of 0. The soname tracks
ABI incompatible changes, not API changes.
  

 
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> In short:
> 
> Well, before fixing this, will you tell me how do you think of
> A. libtcd and tcd-utils release numbering (0<->1)

libtcd 0., tcd-utils directly the release number

> B. libtcd.so share object loading problem

It works when doing things by hand, I'll try a rpmbuild.

> C. soname versioning 

Begin with 0 for soname and 0.0.0 for library.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]