Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537983 dr.trigon@xxxxxxxxx changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dr.trigon@xxxxxxxxx Flag| |needinfo? --- Comment #8 from dr.trigon@xxxxxxxxx 2010-04-07 11:03:18 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > With boost in the F12-testing repository, the boost patch is not needed > anymore. > > Furthermore, I removed the devel package and ship the *.so file in the main > package, because without this program won't work anyway and allways needs to be > 'Require'd. > > ________________________________ > > > Rpmlint is now completely clean: > $ rpmlint vpython.spec vpython-5.13-3.fc12.src.rpm noarch/* x86_64/* > 4 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. > > ________________________________ > > > Spec URL: http://tomspur.fedorapeople.org/review/vpython.spec > SRPM URL: http://tomspur.fedorapeople.org/review/vpython-5.13-3.fc12.src.rpm Maybe I did the wrong thing, but I took your vpython-5.13-3.fc12.src.rpm and did this: rpmbuild --rebuild vpython-5.13-3.fc12.src.rpm then install the resulting vpython-5.13-3.fc12.i686.rpm to my system Then open a console and enter a python session: Python 2.6.2 (r262:71600, Jan 25 2010, 18:46:45) [GCC 4.4.2 20091222 (Red Hat 4.4.2-20)] on linux2 Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information. >>> import visual >>> from visual import * >>> sphere() Speicherzugriffsfehler (Speicherabzug geschrieben) Speicherzugriffsfehler = SEGFAULT So I would be very happy to get this working... What to do now? Greetings -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review