[Bug 196434] Review Request: ren

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: ren


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196434





------- Additional Comments From pertusus@xxxxxxx  2006-10-20 17:58 EST -------
* rmlint is silent
* licence is not explicitely set, however since it comes from
  a post on usenet with explicit permission to reuse and redistribute
  this may be considered public domain.
* follow guidelines
* match upstream
245453453a8bd1c0bf7d03880b97d632  ren-1.0.tar.gz
* %files right

The timestamp of the file is wrong. To get the right timestamp, 
you can use 
wget -N ftp://sunsite.unc.edu/pub/Linux/utils/file/ren-1.0.tar.gz
or 
spectool -g ren.spec

This is not a blocker so it is APPROVED.

It would be better, however to open a new bug such that you appear 
as the reporter. So, please next open a new bug for this review, 
with the latest srpm posted. I'll close that one as a duplicate and 
set the blockers right.

Also go on with the sponsorship process, I'll sponsor you.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]