Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ren https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196434 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus@xxxxxxx 2006-10-20 17:58 EST ------- * rmlint is silent * licence is not explicitely set, however since it comes from a post on usenet with explicit permission to reuse and redistribute this may be considered public domain. * follow guidelines * match upstream 245453453a8bd1c0bf7d03880b97d632 ren-1.0.tar.gz * %files right The timestamp of the file is wrong. To get the right timestamp, you can use wget -N ftp://sunsite.unc.edu/pub/Linux/utils/file/ren-1.0.tar.gz or spectool -g ren.spec This is not a blocker so it is APPROVED. It would be better, however to open a new bug such that you appear as the reporter. So, please next open a new bug for this review, with the latest srpm posted. I'll close that one as a duplicate and set the blockers right. Also go on with the sponsorship process, I'll sponsor you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review