Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ren https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196434 ------- Additional Comments From wolfy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 2006-10-20 17:28 EST ------- Thanks for the review, Patrice. As usual, your eye view is sharper then mine.. at least for the time being :) Indeed, the tar file included by Alan seemed to be a repacked version of the files included in the upstream version. diff -r did not show any differences between the actual content of the two but I have included the original, as it should have been in the first place. AFAIK in all RH/FC distributions, man pages are gzip-ed, hence the .ren.1.gz from the spec. I have decided to follow your advice and play safe, just in case. Please find the updated spec and src.rpm at http://wdl.lug.ro/linux/rpms/ren/ren.spec and http://wdl.lug.ro/linux/rpms/ren/ren-1.0-10.src.rpm respectively. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review