Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: <libtune> - <standard API to access the kernel tunables> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=210007 ------- Additional Comments From Nadia.Derbey@xxxxxxxx 2006-10-20 06:14 EST ------- (In reply to comment #6) > > > 4). > > > %{_libdir}/libtune.la > > > %{_libdir}/libtune.so.0 > > > %{_libdir}/libtune.so.0.0.0 > > > > > > you can glob them using the * > > > > > > > Doing this I would get libtune.a and libtune.so too, while these 2 files have > > to go in the -devel package. Am I wrong? > > > > Before I address your question, I just realized that the version of the libtune > libariries is 0.0.0. Should it be 0.10.1 ? > I thought library version number shouldn't necessarily be the same as the project one? (see http://sources.redhat.com/autobook/autobook/autobook_91.html) I'd rather say it should be 0.10.0 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review