Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=573448 --- Comment #4 from Adrien Bustany <madcat@xxxxxxxxxxxx> 2010-03-28 10:21:48 EDT --- Hmm, is there a policy for where to put symlinks to .so files ? I didn't find anything in the packaging guidelines... Anyway, so put back the .so.1 file where it belongs, and fixed hopefully all your remarks. I had actually run rpmlint, but on the spec file, not the generated rpms... I also merged all the patches in one. I'll write to the author to see if we can get that upstream. SPEC: http://mymadcat.com/~madcat/packages/SPECS/tinycdb.spec SRPM: http://mymadcat.com/~madcat/packages/SRPMS/tinycdb-0.77-2.fc12.src.rpm Note: rpmlint here whines about a non stripped object, is this normal ? I searched for "strip" in the packaging guidelines but found nothing :/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review