[Bug 567257] Review Request: libfm - GIO-based library for file manager-like programs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=567257

--- Comment #9 from Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2010-03-20 13:15:09 EDT ---
For 0.1.9-1:

! gtk2 version specific dependency

>> * BR/Requires
>>   - ">= 2.16.0" on "BR: gtk2-devel" is not needed because gtk2-devel
>>     in currently supported Fedora branches all satisfy this dependency:
>>     https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Explicit_Requires

> The explicit requires guideline doesn't apply here as I'm not requiring a
> library. Only the version number could be omitted, if all currently supported
> Fedora branches fulfilled this requirement, but EPEL does not.

  - So I am talking about "if all currently supported...." item, and are
    you really considering EPEL? ( menu-cache does not even exist on
    EL-5 so I don't think you really care for EPEL. Also  I am against 
    that we should consider EPEL version dependency "by default" )

! duplicate description
> Why not? Only the first part of the description is the same, the rest is
> different for the (sub)packages. IMO the description must be understandable for
> every single package standalone because nether a package manager nor rpm -i
> will show you the description of the required packages.

  - But you don't repeat the description written in "main" package on
    the rest -devel packages (and I think the description should not
    be repeated). 
    I don't see any reason why you want to repeat the description on
    -gtk package when -gtk package depends on main package.

... Anyway the above 2 are not blockers.

* Directory ownership issue
  - Still the following directories are not owned by any packages
---------------------------------------------------------------
%{_libdir}/libfm/ (check -gtk subpackage)
---------------------------------------------------------------

* Desktop file
 
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#desktop-file-install_usage
  - Installed desktop file must be handled by desktop-file-{install,validate}

? By the way do you intend to install libfm only for F-13+ (as F-12 menu-cache
  does not satisfy the dependency)?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]