Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225783 --- Comment #30 from Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@xxxxxxxxxx> 2010-03-10 04:51:24 EST --- (In reply to comment #29) > (In reply to comment #28) > > gdb/osf-share/HP800/cma_thread_io.h is apparently BSD-ish license. Posted: Licensing: gdb/osf-share/ is GPL-incompatible http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb/2010-03/msg00061.html Just it IMO should not be tagged as "BSD with advertising" as the companies listed there are not Berkeley. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing#Good_Licenses Going to use (currently without the gdb/osf-share/ before it gets resolved upstream): License: GPLv3+ and GPLv3+ with exceptions and GPLv2+ and GPL+ and LGPLv2+ and GFDL and Public Domain -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review