Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523877 --- Comment #13 from Chen Lei <supercyper@xxxxxxx> 2010-03-08 22:39:28 EST --- (In reply to comment #12) > Here's the updated 0.9.0 version: > Spec URL: http://www.stanford.edu/~fenn/packs/CBFlib.spec > SRPM URL: http://www.stanford.edu/~fenn/packs/CBFlib-0.9.0-1.fc12.src.rpm > I also included some of the bin programs, but I'm wondering if it would be best > to prepend "cbf" to them, as names like "convert_image" are a bit ambiguous and > potentially conflicting. > I didn't split off -doc and -utils, I'd like to get some feedback from fedora > review people on that. Please do not add utils to main package, it'll lead to multilib conflict. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review