[Bug 523877] Review Request: CBFlib - crystallography binary format library

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523877

--- Comment #12 from Tim Fenn <fenn@xxxxxxxxxxxx> 2010-03-08 16:42:53 EST ---
Here's the updated 0.9.0 version:

Spec URL: http://www.stanford.edu/~fenn/packs/CBFlib.spec
SRPM URL: http://www.stanford.edu/~fenn/packs/CBFlib-0.9.0-1.fc12.src.rpm

I also included some of the bin programs, but I'm wondering if it would be best
to prepend "cbf" to them, as names like "convert_image" are a bit ambiguous and
potentially conflicting.

I didn't split off -doc and -utils, I'd like to get some feedback from fedora
review people on that.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]