Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=565844 --- Comment #11 from Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak@xxxxx> 2010-03-02 12:40:10 EST --- (In reply to comment #10) > Issues and questions > > 1. Are you sure we can mix SPL with GPLv2? No, not sure. Will find out. > 2. rpmlint output > > intellij-idea.i686: E: explicit-lib-dependency cglib This is ok, the package is not a library package in a sense that it does not contain natively executable code. > intellij-idea.i686: E: devel-dependency java-1.6.0-openjdk-devel This is ok, we need the JDK since we are a developer tool (idea even provides ant tasks to compile and instrument code, javac is vital). > intellij-idea.i686: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 9.0.1.94.310-4 > ['9.0.1.94.393-4.fc14', '9.0.1.94.393-4'] Will fix upon next rebase. > intellij-idea.i686: W: unstripped-binary-or-object > /usr/lib/idea/bin/libbreakgen.so This shouldn't have happened, I'll need to find out why didn't it get stripped. > 3. Are you in touch with upstream regarding your patches? Most of the patches are build-related and are not upstreamable. The rest are rebases to later versions of libraries, would break upstreamwards. I'm in touch with upstream regarding usptreaming their changes to stock components though :) > 4. Do you plan to progressively work on enabling other modules? Yes, see the feature page. What's left is basically just Maven, which has unsatisfied dependencies now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review