[Bug 565376] Review Request: qstardict - StarDict clone written in Qt4

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=565376

Naveen Kumar <nkumar@xxxxxxxxxx> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |nkumar@xxxxxxxxxx

--- Comment #5 from Naveen Kumar <nkumar@xxxxxxxxxx> 2010-02-24 05:54:51 EST ---
Here's an unofficial review, using the Tibbs checklist as reference from:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Tibbs/Review_Template


+ source files match upstream: 
sha256sum from both source and upstream were:
52cb7b699159a804158045d2ae79bf80ce28e2febc2bb3e808784242d829c9ee 
qstardict-0.13.1.tar.bz2

+ package meets naming and versioning guidelines.
+ specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently.
+ dist tag is present.
+ build root is correct.
+ license field matches the actual license.
+ license is open source-compatible: license text included in package.
+ latest version is being packaged.
+ BuildRequires are proper.
+ compiler flags are appropriate.
+ %clean is present.
+ package builds in Koji:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2011001
+ package installs properly.
* rpmlint is gives warning but no errors. (rpmlint version 0.94)

 rpmlint OUTPUT on qstardict-0.13.1-1.fc12.src.rpm &
qstardict-0.13.1-1.fc12.x86_64.rpm:
qstardict.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US popup -> pop up, pop-up,
popular
qstardict.src: W: invalid-url URL: http://qstardict.ylsoftware.com
IncompleteRead(0 bytes read)
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings.


* final provides and requires are sane:
 rpm -qp --provides OUTPUT on qstardict-0.13.1-1.fc12.x86_64.rpm:
libstardict.so()(64bit)  
libweb.so()(64bit)  
qstardict = 0.13.1-1.fc12
qstardict(x86-64) = 0.13.1-1.fc12

 rpm -qp --requires OUTPUT on qstardict-0.13.1-1.fc12.x86_64.rpm:
libQtCore.so.4()(64bit)  
libQtDBus.so.4()(64bit)  
libQtGui.so.4()(64bit)  
libQtNetwork.so.4()(64bit)  
libQtXml.so.4()(64bit)  
libX11.so.6()(64bit)  
libc.so.6()(64bit)  
libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.2.5)(64bit)  
libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3.4)(64bit)  
libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.4)(64bit)  
libgcc_s.so.1()(64bit)  
libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.0)(64bit)  
libglib-2.0.so.0()(64bit)  
libm.so.6()(64bit)  
libpthread.so.0()(64bit)  
libpthread.so.0(GLIBC_2.2.5)(64bit)  
libstdc++.so.6()(64bit)  
libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3)(64bit)  
libstdc++.so.6(GLIBCXX_3.4)(64bit)  
libz.so.1()(64bit)  
rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1
rpmlib(FileDigests) <= 4.6.0-1
rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1
rtld(GNU_HASH)  
rpmlib(PayloadIsXz) <= 5.2-1


+ shared libraries are added: ldconfig not run since it acts as plugin and does
not provide API to be used.
+ owns the directories it creates.
+ doesn't own any directories it shouldn't.
+ no duplicates in %files.
+ file permissions are appropriate.
+ scriptlets sane
+ code, not content.
+ documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary.
+ %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package.
+ no headers.
+ no pkgconfig files.
+ no libtool .la droppings.
+ desktop files valid and installed properly.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]