Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=567234 --- Comment #5 from Richard W.M. Jones <rjones@xxxxxxxxxx> 2010-02-22 09:29:06 EST --- Thanks for reviewing this so quickly. Additional comments below: (In reply to comment #4) > * Both the base and devel pacakges list %doc LICENSE I'm going to leave this, as I believe that the current Fedora packaging guidelines are illegal. See my reasoning here: http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/packaging/2009-November/006654.html > Additionally: > > hivex as packaged here would conflict with libguestfs as currently included in > Fedora. This is a blocker until libguestfs is updated to remove hivex. > > hivex should include Conflicts: libguestfs < (version without hivex, when > released) Agreed. I will make a new package in a moment that contains: Conflicts: libguestfs <= 1.0.84 > libguestfs will presumably require hivex in any case, meaning a user can > upgrade seamlessly. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review