[Bug 439630] Review Request: jogl - Java bindings for OpenGL

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439630

--- Comment #52 from Henrique "LonelySpooky" Junior <henriquecsj@xxxxxxxxx> 2010-02-22 07:03:42 EST ---
(In reply to comment #51)

> Are you going to have a separate jogl-javadoc package, by the way, or will that
> come as part of the jogl package?
I'm going to build a separated javadock package.
We already have this functional gluegen package:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439627#c35 but the main problem
with JOGL is that it needs a side by side copy of gluegen to build his
build.xml. The doubt here is if we can use this bundled gluegen in this initial
step and discard it.
This bundled gluegen and our packaged gluegen will be the same. Use the bundled
gluegen only means that the package can be done without major hacking in JOGL
(which, incidentally, are out of my ability).
Maybe it becames clearer if I post here one draft. I'm working on it. =)

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]