Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=564466 --- Comment #5 from Naveen Kumar <nkumar@xxxxxxxxxx> 2010-02-21 23:42:32 EST --- (In reply to comment #3) > (In reply to comment #2) > > > I forgot to question this one. OFL v1.1 isn't on the list of valid licences, so > > I omitted the version when I guess I should have asked upstream about this. > > From the Fedora Licensing page, http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing:Main, > it appears that OFL v1.1 has the short name "OFL", so the spec is correct. > > If you're asking about the "OFL and GPL" versus "OFL or GPL", then > Packaging:LicensingGuidelines says that this one is "or", as the font is dual > licensed. Yep, Thanks for the clarification. I think that should make it sane. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review