[Bug 210087] Review Request: pekwm - Light weight window manager

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: pekwm - Light weight window manager


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=210087





------- Additional Comments From pertusus@xxxxxxx  2006-10-14 12:27 EST -------
(In reply to comment #4)
> (In reply to comment #3)
> > 

> When you say this do you mean to leave it like I have it now, or remove what I
> have now and let this stuff be places in %{_sysconfdir} 

My proposal would be let this stuff be placed in %{_sysconfdir}.
and set scriptsdir=%{_bindir}.
And adjust paths.
 
> > Otherwise scripts use pkill from procps, and also there seems
> > to be a need for xprop, which is a virtual provides of 
> > xorg-x11-utils.
> 
> Does there need to be a requires for this or are they pretty much a standard
> tool to have on board?

They are standard, but I think we shouldn't assume anything,
especially for lightweight window managers, so requires should be 
the right ones.

> Solved this. :)

And that's great :) 



-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]