Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pekwm - Light weight window manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=210087 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus@xxxxxxx 2006-10-14 12:27 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4) > (In reply to comment #3) > > > When you say this do you mean to leave it like I have it now, or remove what I > have now and let this stuff be places in %{_sysconfdir} My proposal would be let this stuff be placed in %{_sysconfdir}. and set scriptsdir=%{_bindir}. And adjust paths. > > Otherwise scripts use pkill from procps, and also there seems > > to be a need for xprop, which is a virtual provides of > > xorg-x11-utils. > > Does there need to be a requires for this or are they pretty much a standard > tool to have on board? They are standard, but I think we shouldn't assume anything, especially for lightweight window managers, so requires should be the right ones. > Solved this. :) And that's great :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review