Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pekwm - Light weight window manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=210087 ------- Additional Comments From miker5slow@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 2006-10-14 10:03 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) > > So my proposal is, keep sysconfdir as is, but move the > scrips to %_bindir, and use sed yourself to regenerate menu from > data/menu.in. When you say this do you mean to leave it like I have it now, or remove what I have now and let this stuff be places in %{_sysconfdir} > > A wild guess is that to put the scripts for example in %_bindir > you could just redefine scriptsdir on the make install command line. This sounds fine to me, Ill see what I can do to get it like that. > Otherwise scripts use pkill from procps, and also there seems > to be a need for xprop, which is a virtual provides of > xorg-x11-utils. Does there need to be a requires for this or are they pretty much a standard tool to have on board? > The default menu brings in a lot of dependencies. I am not convinced > what should be done there. Have a menu with wrong entries? Trim > it down and add requires? > > Would you feel like modifying fluxbox-xdg-menu, remove the footer > and header, change parseMenu to generate pekwm format, > and remove the Submenus from Submenu = "Editors" to > Submenu = "Development", and replace them by an entry like: > Entry = "" { Actions = "Dynamic %{bindir}/pekwm-xdg-menu" }? > This seems to be the best thing to do, currently it doesn't > really integrate with fedora. Solved this. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review