Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=560240 --- Comment #10 from Chen Lei <supercyper@xxxxxxx> 2010-02-03 03:27:15 EST --- (In reply to comment #9) > > Should all warnings in libxls be fixed before making libxls > > available in fedora? > > Well, you've already shown that you don't like to fix any of these. > > It's a tiny package with only few compiler warnings. Fixing real bugs reduces > the risk that some of these issues create breakage, which leads to bug reports. Sorry for my impatience， since libxls are only required by qtiplot, I'll test if libxls 0.3.0 can work with qtiplot. I don't know which version of libxls were used by qtiplot developer, libxls 0.3.0 changes API a lot. If libxls 0.3.0 can work with qtiplot, I'll fix those compile warnings. Otherwise, I'll switch to packaging libxls 0.2.0 which has few compile waring. It doesn't deserve to fix a library that are not used by any program. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review