[Bug 560258] Review Request: quazip - A simple C++ wrapper over Gilles Vollant's ZIP/UNZIP package

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=560258

--- Comment #13 from Dan Horák <dan@xxxxxxxx> 2010-01-31 10:59:36 EST ---
formal review is here, see the notes below:

OK      source files match upstream:
            a091dcc3a4d57c2112bff65c2cac70f9f99fcded  quazip-0.2.3.tar.gz
OK      package meets naming and versioning guidelines.
OK      specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros
consistently.
OK      dist tag is present.
BAD     license field matches the actual license.
OK      license is open source-compatible. License text included in package.
OK      latest version is being packaged.
OK*     BuildRequires are proper.
OK      compiler flags are appropriate.
OK      %clean is present.
OK      package builds in mock (Rawhide/x86_64).
BAD     debuginfo package looks complete.
OK      rpmlint is silent.
OK      final provides and requires look sane.
N/A     %check is present and all tests pass.
OK      shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths,
scriptlets exist
OK      owns the directories it creates.
OK      doesn't own any directories it shouldn't.
OK      no duplicates in %files.
OK      file permissions are appropriate.
OK      correct scriptlets present.
OK      code, not content.
OK      documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary.
OK      %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package.
OK      headers in devel
OK      no pkgconfig files.
OK      no libtool .la droppings.
OK      not a GUI app.

- the library is dual-licensed, the right value is GPLv2+ or LGPLv2+
- you should package the pregenerated html doc and thus having doxygen and
graphviz as BR: is redundant, also running doxygen is not needed and when it's
needed then it must be done carefully because it can cause conflicts in
multilib packages
- the "rm" command removing the internal copy of the minizip library is missing
the path to the files and thus it's a no-op now
- please add a blank line between the changelog entries

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]