Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=555160 --- Comment #3 from Jerry James <loganjerry@xxxxxxxxx> 2010-01-18 14:05:16 EST --- I dropped the gzip Requires and rebuilt. The automatic Requires generator did NOT pick it up. I am building on an F-12 system. Are either of you SURE that you saw gzip identified as a Requires by rpmbuild? I don't know how the Requires generator could possibly find this anyway, since the dependency on gzip is hidden in C code (see app.c). Regarding comment 1, Martin what is your default umask? (Mine is 0022.) I get the correct permissions when building on my machine, in mock, and with a koji scratch build. David Wheeler also reports getting correct permissions in comment 2. This makes me suspect that the problem is with your environment, rather than with the package. In any case, koji-built packages will have correct permissions with the spec file as-is. (Not that I object to using install instead of cp; I'll make that change anyway if I have to make a new package.) The license file is in the correct place. The -libs package is always installed, no matter what, but the so-called "base" package is optional. Therefore, we need the license file where it will always be installed: the -libs package. I considered adding http://fmv.jku.at/papers/Biere-JSAT08.pdf as documentation, but I'm not sure it would really help. It talks about internal optimizations, rather than external interfaces. I'm not competent to write documentation on the external interface anyway, since I don't understand it. I only want this so I can get a functioning csisat, which I also don't understand, since I only want it to get a functioning blast. :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review